Earlier this month, I wrote about the challenges of obtaining what’s known as an abstract of title for a property in Des Moines. It’s a legal document unique to Iowa that requires the services not of a title company, but of a real estate lawyer. If you never owned real estate in Iowa, you’d never know such a document existed.
But now that DBNR is investing in real estate across the country, I’m beginning to realize that not only are there many arcane, regionally specific rules, but also that municipalities are grasping on out-of-town investors as a faceless source of income. Some of our properties have been abandoned, which means that no one is there to see legal notices posted on the door regarding issues such as weed abatement. When the city receives no response to an order, penalties, fines and interest begin to mount up. Out-of-towners, after all, can’t vote, and so are frequently powerless to effectively argue liens and other orders.
We have one property on Logan Street in Minneapolis. It’s a stately, 4BR/2BA two-story house on a good size lot. We’ve gotten more call volume on this property than any other. But even before we obtained it, because of its deteriorated condition, the city had imposed a tear-down order.
We talked to city officials, who told us we had two options: raze it or bring it up to code, at a cost the city estimated: $80,000. If the city razes it, it’ll send us the bill. Interestingly, when we talked to contractors in Minneapolis about this situation, we learned that if you have a local person who knows how to deal with the city, the costs come down considerably. It just requires someone local who knows how to deal in person with the system. One contractor told me, “We do this a lot because there are lots of old properties in the city that have been abandoned. It’s a fairly generic process.”
As it happens, the bank that foreclosed on the property had filed an injunction against the tear-down order, so we have some buffer in terms of figuring out how to deal with this.
We face a similar, but more optimistic situation, with a house on Bonar Street in Indianapolis. This house is in pretty bad shape, and it has $36,000 in back taxes and fines on it to boot (the city had done weed abatement on it, and assessed a fee for doing so). We found a buyer for the house, someone who knew and loved the area because she’d lived there as a child. We told her about the back taxes, warning her that she’d have to deal with the city about them. We don’t know the end of the story, but she thinks she can get the figure whittled down to around $7,000. Why? Because she’s going to be a tax-paying, voting citizen there.
Nobody likes foreclosed homes, and to be fair, municipalities are dealing with severe financial issues because of the loss of property tax revenue from abandoned properties. But it seems like they’re using this opportunity to soak absentee landlords for fees they can’t get from locals. Large out-of-state banks may be bureaucratic molasses to the rest of us, but to municipalities, they’re a godsend. Their slow-moving characteristics mean that fines and penalties can pile up quickly without someone paying attention to them, and corporations are more likely to pay the fines and write them off. The problem is that small companies like DBNR are being caught up in these nets too.
